Overview
UNGASS
Drug Trafficking & Interdiction
Terrorism

Environmental Consequences


While consumer countries are largely spared significant environmental consequences, supply-side eradication schemes have a devastating effect on source countries. Aerial herbicide spraying, a key part of the U.S. funded Plan Colombia, is increasing the rate of rainforest destruction in South America. In an effort to eradicate drug crops in Colombia, toxic herbicides are sprayed from above, hitting water supplies, staple crops, and people.

Since the aerial fumigations began, there have been thousands of reports of serious health problems, destruction of food crops and livestock, contamination of surface water, damage to surrounding wilderness areas, and deforestation resulting from the need of peasants to clear forests and plant food crops on uncontaminated lands. As impoverished peasants move deeper into the Amazon basin they become more dependent on coca as a cash crop. Lack of infrastructure and ongoing civil war make it difficult for peasants to bring legal crops to market. Because the illicit drug trade is so profitable, traffickers will meet farmers at the source of coca cultivation.

In the United States, some Midwestern states use herbicides to eradicate ¡°ditch weed,¡± feral patches of industrial hemp leftover from the U.S. government¡¯s World War II ¡°Hemp for Victory¡± campaign. Because non-intoxicating industrial hemp has no commercial value, the annual ¡°ditch weed¡± eradication efforts are mainly used by drug war bureaucrats to bolster statistics. Other states with significant illicit marijuana cultivation, like Hawaii, have banned the use of herbicides in response to environmental concerns.

The drug war¡¯s threat to the environmental is not limited to overzealous drug warriors armed with toxic herbicides. Organized crime groups who cash in on the drug war¡¯s distortion of supply and demand dynamics have little regard for the environment. In Andean nations, illicit cocaine producers dispose of chemical byproducts by pouring excess chemicals wherever it¡¯s convenient. The hazardous methamphetamine labs of the U.S. are reminiscent of the deadly exploding liquor stills that sprung up throughout the nation during alcohol prohibition. Even growers of organic marijuana impact the environment by felling trees in national forests to make room for illicit grow sites.

The greatest potential threat to the environment is the prospect of biologically engineered fungi intended to wipe out illicit drug crops. Scientists funded by the U.S. and British governments have been developing a killer fungus that destroys opium poppies. The genetically engineered fungus is designed to destroy opium poppies but leave other plant species unharmed. Similar fungi are being designed to eradicate coca and marijuana. Due to concerns that the introduction of genetically altered organisms designed to wipe out entire plant species could prove catastrophic, killer fungi have yet to be put into use. Proponents of biological warfare as a "silver bullet" that will win the drug war once and for all fail to recognize that natural drugs have synthetic counterparts. If every last plant in South America were destroyed, methamphetamine production would increase to meet the demand for cocaine-like drugs.

In 2000, the Colombian government vetoed a U.S.-backed proposal to test a killer fungus (Fusarium oxysporum) on the bushes from which cocaine is made, citing Fusarium¡¯s tendency to mutate and claiming it might pose ¡°grave risks to the environment and humans.¡± Florida drug czar Jim McDonough approved the use of a Fusarium fungus engineered to attack marijuana in his home state, but was forced to give up on his plans to introduce a killer fungus into the state¡¯s ecosystem. Florida¡¯s Department of Environmental Protection reminded McDonough that Fusarium species are capable of evolving rapidly, are prone to mutation, and remain active in warm soils for years.